Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687727›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Prevalence and characteristics of participants in

Louis-Ferdinand Lespine, Diane François, Julie Haesebaert, Jean-Michel Delile, Myriam Savy, Benjamin Tubiana-Rey, Mickael Naassila, Julia de Ternay, Benjamin Rolland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. A scoping review of Dry January: evidence and future directions.Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Louis-Ferdinand LespineService Universitaire d'Addictologie de Lyon (SUAL), Le Vinatier Psychiatrie Universitaire Lyon Métropole, Bron, France.
Diane FrançoisDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation (DRCI), Le Vinatier Psychiatrie Universitaire Lyon Métropole, Bron, France.
Julie HaesebaertResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jean-Michel DelileFédération Addiction, Paris, France.
Myriam SavyAssociation Addictions France, Paris, France.
Benjamin Tubiana-ReyFédération Addiction, Paris, France.
Mickael NaassilaGroupe de Recherche sur l'Alcool et les Pharmacodépendances (GRAP), INSERM U1247, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Julia de TernayService Universitaire d'Addictologie de Lyon (SUAL), Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Benjamin RollandService Universitaire d'Addictologie de Lyon (SUAL), Le Vinatier Psychiatrie Universitaire Lyon Métropole, Bron, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dry January is a one-month alcohol abstinence challenge for the general population running since 2013 in the United Kingdom, and 2020 in France. Dry January has gained increasing popularity among the public, but studies assessing the individual characteristics associated with awareness and participation remain sparse. Methods: Using quota sampling, a representative sample of 5,000 French adults completed an online cross-sectional survey between 8 and 17th January 2024. Chi-square tests and binary logistic regressions were used to explore demographic and alcohol-related characteristics associated with awareness of the Dry January campaign as well as participation. Results: Among 4,075 past-year alcohol users, 2,468 (61%) were aware of the "Dry January" campaign, of whom 497 (20%) were participants (12% of all alcohol users). Extrapolated to the entire adult French population, this corresponds to an estimated 4.5 million people participating in the Dry January 2024. Awareness was comparable between genders and across age groups, but was greater among individuals with higher occupational status, and lower among those living in Eastern regions of France. Individuals aware of the campaign were more likely to self-evaluate their drinking as "at risk" and to report high-risk consumption. Participation rates did not differ by gender, occupational status, or region but decreased with age. Compared to non-participants, Dry January participants were more likely to self-identify their drinking as at-risk, to be concerned about health-related effects of alcohol, to be concerned about their control (or lack thereof) over drinking, and to report hazardous use or possible alcohol use disorder. However, no evidence was found for an association between high-risk consumption based on AUDIT-C and participation. Among participants, aiming for reduction (vs. abstinence) and official registration (vs. unofficial participation), were associated with worsened alcohol-related measures. Conclusion: This study indicates a stable level of awareness, but encouraging participation in Dry January in France. The results also confirm that temporary alcohol abstinence campaigns primarily attract high-risk drinkers and individuals reporting harmful consequences related to alcohol.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAdolescentAdultAgedAlcohol AbstinenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultalcoholDry Januaryparticipationprevalencetemporary abstinence campaign

Identifiers

PMID39687727
PMCPMC11647028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.