ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Incidence, timing and variation in unplanned readmissions within 30-days following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurse-Led Large Language Model Chatbot for Predicting and Preventing Complications After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is the most common cardiac surgery, yet little is known about unplanned readmissions after CABG despite increasing clinical and policy focus on reducing readmissions. We assessed the incidence, timing, and reasons for unplanned readmission within 30 days of CABG and evaluated for variation in readmission rates across hospitals in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). Method: We identified isolated CABG procedures from 2013 to 2017 across all public and most private hospitals in ANZ. The primary outcome was unplanned (acute) readmissions within 30-days of discharge. Hospital specific risk standardised readmission rates (RSRRs) and 95% CI were estimated using a hierarchical generalized linear model accounting for differences in patient characteristics. Results: 52,104 patients (mean age 66.1 ± 9.9 years, 17.6 % female, 30.7 % acute) were included. The 30-day unplanned readmission rate was 12.7 % (n = 6,613) and was higher following urgent surgery (16.2 %, n = 2,595). Readmission rates peaked on days 2-4 with a median time to readmission of 9 (IQR: 4-17) days. Procedural complications and chest pain were the most common diagnoses on readmission. Risk adjustment model demonstrated satisfactory performance (C-statistic = 0.62). The median RSRR was 12.8 % (range: 6.1-20.3 %) across 37 hospitals. Only one hospital had its RSRR estimate lower than average and no hospitals had higher than average RSRR. Conclusion: One-in-8 patients undergoing CABG experienced an unplanned readmission within 30-day, rising to one-in-6 following urgent CABG. There was little statistically significant institutional variation in RSRR. Nevertheless, many readmissions are likely related to care quality and potentially preventable, highlighting scope for clinical and policy interventions to reduce readmissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.