Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687641›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2024

Acellular dermal matrices in reconstructive surgery; history, current implications and future perspectives for surgeons.

Ömer F Dilek, Kamuran Z Sevim, Osman N Dilek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ömer F DilekDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul 34396, Türkiye. ofdilek@gmail.com.
Kamuran Z SevimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul 34396, Türkiye.
Osman N DilekDepartment of Surgery, İzmir Katip Celebi University, School of Medicine, İzmir 35150, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale defects of body in the reconstructive surgical practice, and the helplessness of their repair with autologous tissues, have been an important factor in the development of artificial biological products for the temporary, definitive, or staged repair of these defects. A major advance in the field of plastic and other reconstructive surgery in this regard has been the introduction and successful use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs). In recent years, not only the type of tissue from which ADMs are produced, product range, diversity and areas of use have increased, but their use in reconstructive fields, especially in post oncologic breast surgery, has become highly regarded and this has favored ADMs to be a potential cornerstone in specific and well-defined surgical fields in future. It is essential that reconstructive surgeons become familiar with some of the ADM's as well as the advantages and limitations to their use. This review not only provides basic science and clinical evidence of the current use of ADMs in wide range of surgical fields but also targets to keep them as an important backdrop in the armamentarium of reconstructive surgeons. Brief considerations of possible future directions for ADMs are also conducted in the end.

Indexed as

Acellular dermal matricesBreastDecellularizationReconstructionSurgeryTissue defect

Identifiers

PMID39687641
PMCPMC11525903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.