Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687625›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Quantifying conformational changes in the TCR:pMHC-I binding interface.

Benjamin McMaster, Christopher J Thorpe, Jamie Rossjohn, Charlotte M Deane, Hashem Koohy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. T Cell Thoughts.Immunological reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. HLA micropolymorphisms confine neoantigen conformational adaptability and guide T cell receptor selectivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin McMasterKoohy Lab, Medical Research Council Translational Immune Discovery Unit (MRC TIDU), Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine (WIMM), Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christopher J ThorpeOpen Targets, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Jamie RossjohnRossjohn Lab, Infection and Immunity Program and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Charlotte M DeaneOxford Protein Informatics Group, Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hashem KoohyKoohy Lab, Medical Research Council Translational Immune Discovery Unit (MRC TIDU), Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine (WIMM), Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: T cells form one of the key pillars of adaptive immunity. Using their surface bound T cell antigen receptors (TCRs), these cells screen millions of antigens presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) or MHC-like molecules. In other protein families, the dynamics of protein-protein interactions have important implications for protein function. Case studies of TCR:class I peptide-MHCs (pMHC-Is) structures have reported mixed results on whether the binding interfaces undergo conformational change during engagement and no robust statistical quantification has been done to generalise these results. Thus, it remains an open question of whether movement occurs in the binding interface that enables the recognition and activation of T cells. Methods: In this work, we quantify the conformational changes in the TCR:pMHC-I binding interface by creating a dataset of 391 structures, comprising 22 TCRs, 19 MHC alleles, and 79 peptide structures in both unbound (apo) and bound (holo) conformations. Results: In support of some case studies, we demonstrate that all complementarity determining region (CDR) loops move to a certain extent but only CDR3α and CDR3β loops modify their shape when binding pMHC-Is. We also map the contacts between TCRs and pMHC-Is, generating a novel fingerprint of TCRs on MHC molecules and show that the CDR3α tends to bind the N-terminus of the peptide and the CDR3β tends to bind the C-terminus of the peptide. Finally, we show that the presented peptides can undergo conformational changes when engaged by TCRs, as has been reported in past literature, but novelly show these changes depend on how the peptides are anchored in the MHC binding groove. Conclusions: Our work has implications in understanding the behaviour of TCR:pMHC-I interactions and providing insights that can be used for modelling Tcell antigen specificity, an ongoing grand challenge in immunology.

Indexed as

Histocompatibility Antigens Class IProtein BindingProtein ConformationReceptors, Antigen, T-CellBinding SitesComplementarity Determining RegionsHumansModels, MolecularPeptidesT-LymphocytesComplementarity Determining RegionsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellconformational changesHLAMHCpeptidestructural biologyT cell antigen specificityTCR

Identifiers

PMID39687625
PMCPMC11646856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.