Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687611›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2024

Perioperative tislelizumab with four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase 2 study.

Na Zhou, Yuwei Hua, Yuping Ge, Qiang Wang, Chenyu Wang, Jia He, Luo Zhao, Shuangni Yu, Junfang Yan, Lin Zhao and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Na Zhou *Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuwei Hua *Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuping Ge *Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiang WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chenyu WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jia HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Luo ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shuangni YuDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Junfang YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lin ZhaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chunmei BaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The application of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer needs further exploration. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). Methods: In this phase II study, patients with clinical stages of II-IVA (T3-T4 and/or node positive) potentially resectable LA-ESCC were enrolled. Patients received neoadjuvant tislelizumab and chemotherapy every 3 weeks for 4 cycles before surgery and adjuvant tislelizumab for 9 months. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included R0 resection, disease free survival (DFS), adverse events (AE), and biomarkers for predicting efficacy. Results: The study included 30 patients. 25 patients completed neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and underwent surgery, 96% with R0 resection. The pCR and MPR rate was 44% and 52%. The 6-month and 1-year DFS rate was 100% and 75.3%. 43.3% patients experienced severe (grade 3-4) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 5 patients developed severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Further exploration found that a group of peripheral lymphocyte subsets increased significantly after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy in patients who achieved pCR, suggesting the importance of dynamic monitoring of circulating lymphocyte. Conclusions: The combination of perioperative tislelizumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy has achieved an encouraging pCR rate and demonstrated a manageable safety profile in patients with potentially resectable ESCC. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2100043772.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedEsophagectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedtislelizumabesophageal squamous cell carcinomaimmunotherapyneoadjuvant chemotherapyperioperative treatmenttislelizumab

Identifiers

PMID39687611
PMCPMC11647006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.