Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687602›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025

Application of a deep learning algorithm for the diagnosis of HCC.

Philip Leung Ho Yu, Keith Wan-Hang Chiu, Jianliang Lu, Gilbert C S Lui, Jian Zhou, Ho-Ming Cheng, Xianhua Mao, Juan Wu, Xin-Ping Shen, King Ming Kwok and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Philip Leung Ho YuDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Keith Wan-Hang ChiuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jianliang LuDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Gilbert C S LuiDepartment of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ho-Ming ChengDepartment of Medical Imaging, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xianhua MaoDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Juan WuDepartment of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xin-Ping ShenDepartment of Medical Imaging, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
King Ming KwokDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Wai Kuen KanDepartment of Radiology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Y C HoDepartment of Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Hung Tat ChanDepartment of Medical Imaging, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Peng XiaoDepartment of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Lung-Yi MakDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Vivien W M TsuiDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Cynthia HuiDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Pui Mei LamDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zijie DengDepartment of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jiaqi GuoDepartment of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Li NiDepartment of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jinhua HuangDepartment of Minimal Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Sarah YuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chengzhi PengLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Wai Keung LiDepartment of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Man-Fung YuenDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Wai-Kay SetoDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by a high mortality rate. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) results in a considerable number of indeterminate observations, rendering an accurate diagnosis difficult. Methods: We developed four deep learning models for diagnosing HCC on computed tomography (CT) via a training-validation-testing approach. Thin-slice triphasic CT liver images and relevant clinical information were collected and processed for deep learning. HCC was diagnosed and verified via a 12-month clinical composite reference standard. CT observations among at-risk patients were annotated using LI-RADS. Diagnostic performance was assessed by internal validation and independent external testing. We conducted sensitivity analyses of different subgroups, deep learning explainability evaluation, and misclassification analysis. Results: From 2,832 patients and 4,305 CT observations, the best-performing model was Spatio-Temporal 3D Convolution Network (ST3DCN), achieving area under receiver-operating-characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.919 (95% CI, 0.903-0.935) and 0.901 (95% CI, 0.879-0.924) at the observation (n = 1,077) and patient (n = 685) levels, respectively during internal validation, compared with 0.839 (95% CI, 0.814-0.864) and 0.822 (95% CI, 0.790-0.853), respectively for standard of care radiological interpretation. The negative predictive values of ST3DCN were 0.966 (95% CI, 0.954-0.979) and 0.951 (95% CI, 0.931-0.971), respectively. The observation-level AUCs among at-risk patients, 2-5-cm observations, and singular portovenous phase analysis of ST3DCN were 0.899 (95% CI, 0.874-0.924), 0.872 (95% CI, 0.838-0.909) and 0.912 (95% CI, 0.895-0.929), respectively. In external testing (551/717 patients/observations), the AUC of ST3DCN was 0.901 (95% CI, 0.877-0.924), which was non-inferior to radiological interpretation (AUC 0.900; 95% CI, 0.877--923). Conclusions: ST3DCN achieved strong, robust performance for accurate HCC diagnosis on CT. Thus, deep learning can expedite and improve the process of diagnosing HCC. Impact and implications: The clinical applicability of deep learning in HCC diagnosis is potentially huge, especially considering the expected increase in the incidence and mortality of HCC worldwide. Early diagnosis through deep learning can lead to earlier definitive management, particularly for at-risk patients. The model can be broadly deployed for patients undergoing a triphasic contrast CT scan of the liver to reduce the currently high mortality rate of HCC.

Indexed as

AICTHCCImagingLIRADSLiver cancer

Identifiers

PMID39687602
PMCPMC11648772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.