ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
Application of a deep learning algorithm for the diagnosis of HCC.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence models in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- How to apply artificial intelligence (AI) to facilitate and enhance MASH trials.Hepatology international · 2026Review
- Virus infections and cancers: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- 3DAD: Super-Resolution Image Synthesis from Anisotropic CT Images Using a Three-Dimensional Adversarial Diffusion Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Concurrent AI assistance with LI-RADS classification for contrast enhanced MRI of focal hepatic nodules: a multi-reader, multi-case study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Pioneering efficient deep learning architectures for enhanced hepatocellular carcinoma prediction and clinical translation.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in hepatology.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Explainable artificial intelligence and ensemble learning for hepatocellular carcinoma classification: State of the art, performance, and clinical implications.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- From texture analysis to artificial intelligence: global research landscape and evolutionary trajectory of radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Big Data Analytics in Large Cohorts: Opportunities and Challenges for Research in Hepatology.Seminars in liver disease · 2025Review
- Targeting hepatitis B virus-associated nephropathy: efficacy and challenges of current antiviral treatments.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Human Cancer: Is It Time to Update the Diagnostic and Predictive Models in Managing Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by a high mortality rate. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) results in a considerable number of indeterminate observations, rendering an accurate diagnosis difficult. Methods: We developed four deep learning models for diagnosing HCC on computed tomography (CT) via a training-validation-testing approach. Thin-slice triphasic CT liver images and relevant clinical information were collected and processed for deep learning. HCC was diagnosed and verified via a 12-month clinical composite reference standard. CT observations among at-risk patients were annotated using LI-RADS. Diagnostic performance was assessed by internal validation and independent external testing. We conducted sensitivity analyses of different subgroups, deep learning explainability evaluation, and misclassification analysis. Results: From 2,832 patients and 4,305 CT observations, the best-performing model was Spatio-Temporal 3D Convolution Network (ST3DCN), achieving area under receiver-operating-characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.919 (95% CI, 0.903-0.935) and 0.901 (95% CI, 0.879-0.924) at the observation (n = 1,077) and patient (n = 685) levels, respectively during internal validation, compared with 0.839 (95% CI, 0.814-0.864) and 0.822 (95% CI, 0.790-0.853), respectively for standard of care radiological interpretation. The negative predictive values of ST3DCN were 0.966 (95% CI, 0.954-0.979) and 0.951 (95% CI, 0.931-0.971), respectively. The observation-level AUCs among at-risk patients, 2-5-cm observations, and singular portovenous phase analysis of ST3DCN were 0.899 (95% CI, 0.874-0.924), 0.872 (95% CI, 0.838-0.909) and 0.912 (95% CI, 0.895-0.929), respectively. In external testing (551/717 patients/observations), the AUC of ST3DCN was 0.901 (95% CI, 0.877-0.924), which was non-inferior to radiological interpretation (AUC 0.900; 95% CI, 0.877--923). Conclusions: ST3DCN achieved strong, robust performance for accurate HCC diagnosis on CT. Thus, deep learning can expedite and improve the process of diagnosing HCC. Impact and implications: The clinical applicability of deep learning in HCC diagnosis is potentially huge, especially considering the expected increase in the incidence and mortality of HCC worldwide. Early diagnosis through deep learning can lead to earlier definitive management, particularly for at-risk patients. The model can be broadly deployed for patients undergoing a triphasic contrast CT scan of the liver to reduce the currently high mortality rate of HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.