ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2024
Cesarean delivery and its determining factors: A hospital-based study in Jashore District, Bangladesh.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron Adequacy Modifies the Association Between Prenatal Diet Quality and Pregnancy-Related Anxiety in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Assessment of prevalence, perceptions, and factors associated with reported history of caesarean section among women in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Factors behind high caesarean section in Bangladesh: insight from a systematic literature review and meta-synthesis.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Does community pressure matter in cesarean deliveries in Bangladesh? An analysis of nationally representative surveys.PloS one · 2025Article
- Patients preference for mode of delivery in a Middle Eastern society: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rising prevalence of cesarean deliveries (CD) is a major public health problem worldwide, especially in Bangladesh. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with cesarean deliveries in the Jashore district of Bangladesh. Study design: This cross-sectional study, conducted from December 2022 to February 2023 in Jashore district, Bangladesh, involved face-to-face interviews with 662 mothers during hospital visits. Methods: A pretested, structured, and validated questionnaire was employed to gather information on socioeconomic characteristics, obstetric history, maternal healthcare utilization, and factors influencing the choice of delivery method. Multinomial logistic regression models were employed to assess and predict determining factors influencing cesarean delivery. Results: The study revealed a high cesarean delivery (CD) prevalence of 70.5 %, exceeding the WHO-recommended threshold. Key socioeconomic factors associated with increased CD rates included rural residence, younger maternal age (15-20 years), nuclear family structure, and husbands in business. Additionally, private hospital deliveries, a history of previous CD, maternal self-preference, and doctor's influence were significant predictors of CD. The majority of participants believed CD enhances maternal safety (74.6 %) and alleviates pain (74.8 %). Conclusion: The high rate of cesarean deliveries in Jashore highlights the need for public health interventions that improve access to quality maternal care and promote evidence-based decision-making. Reducing unnecessary cesarean procedures, particularly in private hospitals, and enhancing patient education can significantly improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.