ArticleInfection prevention in practice2025
A 4-year outbreak of MRSA ST72-MRSA-IV
Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MRSA: the enduring foe.Infection prevention in practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are identified as high risk for Methods: An outbreak control team was convened and interventions applied including refresher training in hand and environmental hygiene, review of practice with regard to aseptic access of medical devices and consideration of antibiotic use in the unit. MRSA isolates were referred to the Irish National MRSA Reference Laboratory where Conclusions: In the clinical unit in which this outbreak occurred, the usual control measures to prevent spread of MRSA were in place. Recent Joint Healthcare Infection Society and Infection Prevention Society Guidance does not recommend routine staff screening for MRSA but does support its consideration in an outbreak of an unusual strain. In total, 9 patients and 2 staff were affected by this outbreak. There were 4 infections and 3 deaths. Sustained outbreak closure was necessary to protect certain national clinical programmes and was achievable only when colonised staff were no longer working in the unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.