Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687526›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Critical design decisions and user demographics in enhancing real-time digital mental health interventions: A systematic review.

John Fouyaxis, Niranjan Bidargaddi, Wei Du, Jeffrey C L Looi, Jessica Lipschitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John FouyaxisDigital Health Research Lab, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9537-523X
Niranjan BidargaddiDigital Health Research Lab, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2868-9260
Wei DuDigital Health Research Lab, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jeffrey C L LooiAcademic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, The Australian National University School of Medicine and Psychology, Garran, ACT, Australia.
Jessica LipschitzDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Real-time digital mental health interventions, primarily enabled by smartphone technology offer continuous, personalised support, that adapts in response to the changing needs of individuals. Despite being prominently explored in populations with psychiatric disorders, there remains a notable gap in the systematic analysis of demographic characteristics, as well as the foundational design decisions or rules that underpin the personalisation of these interventions. Objectives: (a) Identifying the prevalent design decisions to enable personalisation within real-time digital mental health interventions, (b) the influence of these design decisions on the clinical outcomes of the interventions, and (c) the demographic characteristics of populations with psychiatric disorders targeted by real-time digital health interventions. Methods: Following PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted of peer-reviewed literature focusing on real-time digital interventions in populations with clinically diagnosed psychiatric disorders. We undertook a narrative synthesis to derive the demographics and personalisation design decisions of the interventions and conducted a pooled meta-analysis to evaluate clinical outcomes. Results: Interventions predominantly targeted female and Caucasian demographics, yielding modest clinical improvements. Our analysis identified nine critical personalisation design decisions concerning measurement, intervention, and interactions with health professional with varying influence on clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Understanding the complex nuances of design decisions that shape real-time digital health interventions, as well as identifying which patient demographics benefit most, is fundamental for their effective clinical impact and safe use. Prospero Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020161663.

Indexed as

digital health interventionsdigital mental health interventionsecological momentary interventionsmental healthmHealthMobile healthpersonalisationreal-timetailoring

Identifiers

PMID39687526
PMCPMC11648022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.