ArticlePEC innovation2024
The nursing shared decision making attitude scale: A translation and psychometric evaluation study.
Article in PEC innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nurses have an increasingly important role in the 'shared decision-making' process. Knowledge about attitudes can facilitate the implementation process of the different roles of nurses in shared decision-making. However, no specific instrument is available in Dutch to assess Dutch nurses' attitudes towards shared decision-making. Aim: This study aims to translate the Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale into Dutch and evaluate its psychometric properties. Design: Psychometric evaluation study. Settings: A general hospital in the Netherlands. Participants: A random sample of 128 nurses. Methods: The translation was performed using translation and cross-cultural guidelines. Experts assessed content validity. In a cross-sectional study, 128 nurses completed the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale. The factor structure of the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale was determined by principal components analysis. Internal consistency and standard error of measurement (SEM) were assessed. A first and simple hypothesis for construct validity was tested. Results: Experts rated content validity as adequate. The principal components analysis revealed a 2-factor structure as most suitable (Empathic communication and Mastery learning) consistent with the original Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale. The explained variance was 55 %. The internal consistency was 0.84 and 0.78 for the subscales and the SEM was 1,65. The mean score on the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale was 46,4 (CI: 42.77-49.23). A first and simple hypothesis that more experience in shared decision-making would lead to higher shared decision-making scores on the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale, could not be confirmed. Conclusion and innovation: This study fills in a gap concerning available instruments to assess attitudes towards SDM among nurses since there is no instrument available for the Dutch population.The results of this study are a first and somewhat promising step towards further developing the reliability and validity of the Dutch Nursing Shared Decision Attitude scale as a measure of hospital nurses' attitudes towards shared decision-making. Such measurement information is relevant to researchers and nurses involved in the implementation of shared decision-making in nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.