ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2024
Partial Detachment of an ILM Inverted Flap After a Successful Closure of a Full-Thickness Traumatic Macular Hole.
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report a case of partial detachment of an inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap following a successful closure of a full-thickness traumatic macular hole. Observations: A 24-year-old male patient presented with a history of a blunt trauma and a full-thickness macular hole. Visual acuity was (20/50) then deteriorated to (20/100) prior to surgery. He underwent pars plana vitrectomy with an inverted ILM flap and gas tamponade. Postoperatively, successful closure of the hole was noted with a visible hinged ILM flap observed over the retina in optical coherence tomography (OCT). Three months later, the patient presented with a complaint of a central floater. Visual acuity was (20/30) and a partially detached ILM flap was noted in the OCT. Conclusions and Importance: Inverted ILM flap might detach from the retinal surface after gas resolution and successful closure of a full-thickness macular hole.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.