Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687431›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Maintenance therapy with trofosfamide, idarubicin and etoposide in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and other high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (CWS-2007-HR): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

Ewa Koscielniak, Gustaf Ljungman, Bernarda Kazanowska, Felix Niggli, Monika Sparber-Sauer, Rupert Handgretinger, Martin Zimmermann, Joachim Boos, Bernd Blank, Erika Hallmen and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Ewa KoscielniakKlinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Stuttgart, Germany.
Gustaf LjungmanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Pediatric Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Bernarda KazanowskaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and BMT, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.
Felix NiggliDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Monika Sparber-SauerKlinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Stuttgart, Germany.
Rupert HandgretingerHospital for Children and Adolescents, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Martin ZimmermannDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Joachim BoosMedical Faculty, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus Münster, Germany.
Bernd BlankKlinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Stuttgart, Germany.
Erika HallmenKlinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Stuttgart, Germany.
Irene Teichert von LüttichauChildren's Hospital, Hospital Schwabing, Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University München, Germany.
Irene SchmidDr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University München, Germany.
Birgit FröhlichDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Germany.
Hermann L MüllerUniversity Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Wolfgang BehnischDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, Immunology and Pulmonology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Ruth LadensteinSt Anna Children's Hospital, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Department of Studies and Statistics for Integrated Research and Projects and Medical University of Vienna, Paediatric Department, Vienna, Austria.
Monika ScheerDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian VokuhlSection of Pediatric Pathology, Department of Pathology, University Bonn, Germany.
Thekla von KalleInstitute of Radiology Olgahospital, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend und Frauenmedizin, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Claudia BlattmannKlinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Stuttgart, Germany.
Stefan BielackKlinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Stuttgart, Germany.
Thomas KlingebielUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Department for Children and Adolescents, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rhabdomyosarcoma and other soft tissue sarcomas (STS) with high-risk features are still associated with an unsatisfactory outcome. We evaluated the efficacy of oral maintenance therapy added at the end of standard therapy in patients with high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma and STS. Methods: CWS-2007-HR was a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, phase 3 trial done at 87 centers in 5 countries. Eligible patients were those aged 6 months to 21 years with non-metastatic incompletely resected embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma occurring in unfavourable sites with unfavourable age (≥10 years) and/or tumour size (>5 cm); all non-metastatic alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma and those with any non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma with nodal involvement. A further group was also eligible: patients with non-metastatic undifferentiated sarcoma, extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma and primary unresected synovial sarcoma. Patients in complete remission at the end of standard therapy (nine cycles of ifosfamide, vincristine with doxorubicine or dactinomycin, and surgery or radiotherapy, or both) were randomised to either stop treatment (S-arm) or to receive oral maintenance therapy (M-arm) with eight 10-day courses (25 weeks) of trofosfamide (2 × 75 mg/m Findings: Between July 1st, 2009 and June 30th, 2019, 195 patients were randomly assigned to the M-arm (n = 96) or S-arm (n = 99). In the intent-to-treat population, with a median follow-up of 5.2 years (IQR 3.9-6.1) for surviving patients, the 3-year EFS in the M-arm was 66.9% (95% CI 58.1-77.2) versus 75.6% (67.6-84.6) in the S-arm (hazard ratio, (HR) 1.62, 95% CI 0.98-2.69, p = 0.06). 3-year OS was 82.8% (95% CI 75.4-90.8) in the M-arm versus 84.7% (95% CI 77.8-92.1) in the S-arm (HR 1.55, 95% CI 0.84-2.89, p = 0.17). Grade 3-4 adverse events were haematological in 66% of patients, febrile infections in 6%, gastrointestinal in 10%, and sensory neuropathy in 1%. Interpretation: The addition of 25 weeks of oral maintenance therapy with trofosfamide, etoposide and idarubicin after standard therapy does not improve EFS and OS in patients with high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma and other STS. Funding: Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung Grant No.DKS 2009.09, DKS 2012.06, DKS 2015.13, DKS 2018.10 and DKS 2021.04.

Indexed as

Maintenance therapyRhabdomyosarcomaSoft tissue sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID39687431
PMCPMC11648192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.