ArticleERJ open research2024
High-frequency percussive ventilation in acute respiratory failure.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of Arterial PaCODiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: High-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) is a ventilation mode characterised by high-frequency breaths. This study investigated the impact of HFPV on gas exchange and clinical outcomes in acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients during spontaneous breathing, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV). Methods: This systematic review included randomised and nonrandomised studies up to August 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on adult ARF patients, HFPV application, comparisons with other ventilation modes, and outcomes related to oxygenation and clinical parameters. A pooled data analysis was performed comparing HFPV with iMV concerning gas exchange, pulmonary infection and mortality. Results: Of the 51 identified records, 29 met the inclusion criteria. HFPV was safely and effectively applied to ARF patients during spontaneous breathing or NIV, improving oxygenation. For patients who underwent iMV, HFPV significantly enhanced oxygenation and the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, reduced pulmonary infection occurrence and improved survival. Barotrauma rates were not elevated with HFPV, and haemodynamic stability remained unaffected. HFPV was also utilised in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, resulting in improved lung recruitment and oxygenation. Conclusion: HFPV had favourable effects on physiological and certain clinical outcomes in ARF patients. However, the overall evidence quality remains weak, necessitating large-scale randomised controlled trials for definitive conclusions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.