Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687364›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

Survey data on public awareness on the value of marine biodiversity conservation in the Strait of Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea).

Evelina Carmen Sabatella, Fabio Fiorentino, Umberto Grande, Valentina Lauria, Danilo Scannella, Germana Garofalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evelina Carmen SabatellaInstitute for research on population and social policies (IRPPS), National Research Council (CNR), Corso S. Vincenzo Ferreri, 12, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.
Fabio FiorentinoInstitute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnology (IRBIM), National Research Council (CNR), Via L. Vaccara 61, 91026, Mazara del Vallo, Italy.
Umberto GrandeInstitute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnology (IRBIM), National Research Council (CNR), Via L. Vaccara 61, 91026, Mazara del Vallo, Italy.
Valentina LauriaInstitute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnology (IRBIM), National Research Council (CNR), Via L. Vaccara 61, 91026, Mazara del Vallo, Italy.
Danilo ScannellaInstitute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnology (IRBIM), National Research Council (CNR), Via L. Vaccara 61, 91026, Mazara del Vallo, Italy.
Germana GarofaloInstitute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnology (IRBIM), National Research Council (CNR), Via L. Vaccara 61, 91026, Mazara del Vallo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Strait of Sicily (SoS) is a region of key ecological importance because of its peculiar oceanographic conditions, high biodiversity, and critical role as a transition area between the western and eastern basins of the Mediterranean Sea. The SoS was designated as an Ecologically or Biologically Significant Area (EBSA) by the Contracting Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2014 [1] and acknowledged as an Important Shark and Ray Area (ISRA) in 2023 [2]. Ongoing research and conservation efforts are essential to protect this vital marine corridor from increasing anthropogenic pressures. Public awareness and perception can significantly influence policy development, resource allocation, and the effectiveness of conservation plans. Despite its great importance, surveys to assess society awareness and perception have been rarely implemented in the SoS, in particular from the perspective of marine biodiversity as a provider of valuable ecosystem services. This dataset presents raw data from a survey conducted through in-person interviews between November 2023 and January 2024, yielding 128 responses from 7 locations along the southern coast of Sicily, which borders the northern sector of the SoS. The survey was structured in 4 sections: (1) confidence and awareness about the biodiversity conservation in the SoS; (2) perception about habitat conservation efforts and their level of effectiveness; (3) willingness to pay for habitat conservation in the SoS; and (4) socio-demographic information. Participation was voluntary, responses were anonymous and all respondents provided informed consent after reading a participant information form at the beginning of the survey. This dataset, despite its limited size, is a valuable resource for quantitative analyses, filling a gap in similar analysis in the study area and offering an original perspective focused on biodiversity as an ecosystem service. It provides opportunities for researchers and policymakers to estimate the economic value that individuals place on preserving marine biodiversity. By assessing these valuations, stakeholders can gain insights into the public's willingness to pay for conservation initiatives and their prioritization of different aspects of marine ecosystem preservation. The dataset accompanying this article includes several critical components. It contains a copy of the questionnaire used to gather data, providing transparency and allowing for replication or further study. Additionally, detailed information about the participants is included, which can help understanding the demographic and socioeconomic factors that influence public perception and preferences. The data itself is meticulously compiled, and a corresponding codebook is provided to facilitate accurate interpretation and analysis. This robust documentation ensures that users can efficiently navigate and utilize the dataset for their specific research needs.

Indexed as

Ecosystem servicesQuestionnaireSustainable management of marine resources

Identifiers

PMID39687364
PMCPMC11648202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.