ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Therapeutic potential of Xihuang Pill in colorectal cancer: Metabolomic and microbiome-driven approaches.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiota Metabolic Reprogramming Drives Endocrine and Immune Resistance in Hormone-Dependent Cancers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Macronutrient quality and colorectal cancer outcomes: evidence from the PLCO screening trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Regulatory effects of traditional Chinese medicine on the breast-cancer immune microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Xihuang Pill (XHP), a venerated traditional Chinese medicine, has demonstrated significant anti-cancer capabilities. Despite its proven efficacy, the scarcity of comprehensive pharmacological studies limits the widespread application of XHP. This research endeavor seeks to demystify the therapeutic underpinnings of XHP, particularly in the realm of colorectal cancer (CRC) therapy. Methods: In this study, mice harboring CT26 tumors were divided into four groups, each administered with either XHP monotherapy, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or a combination of both. The tumor growth trajectory was closely monitored to evaluate the effectiveness of these anti-neoplastic interventions. Advanced techniques, including 16S-rDNA gene sequencing and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS), were harnessed to scrutinize the gut microbiota and serum metabolite profiles. Immunohistochemical assays were employed to gauge the expression levels of CD4, CD8, and Foxp3, thereby providing insights into the dynamics of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes within the tumor microenvironment. Results: Our findings indicate that XHP effectively suppresses the initiation and progression of colorectal tumors. The combinatorial therapy of XHP with 5-FU exhibited an enhanced inhibitory effect on tumor growth. Metabolic profiling revealed that XHP induced notable metabolic shifts, particularly impacting pathways such as steroid hormone synthesis, arachidonic acid metabolism, purine biosynthesis, and renin secretion. Notably, 17α-ethinyl estradiol and α-ergocryptine were identified as serum metabolites with the most substantial increase following XHP administration. Analysis of the gut microbiome suggested that XHP promoted the expansion of specific bacterial taxa, including Conclusion: This study delineates a potential mechanism by which XHP inhibits CRC tumorigenesis through modulating the gut microbiota, serum metabolites, and reshaping the tumor immune microenvironment in a murine CRC model. These findings contribute to a more profound understanding and potentially broaden the clinical utility of XHP in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.