ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2024
[Experience of setting up a state pharmacovigilance committee during the COVID-19 pandemicExperiencia de la puesta en marcha de un comité estatal de farmacovigilancia durante la pandemia de COVID-19].
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the implementation and pioneering work of a vaccine pharmacovigilance committee in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, for the analysis of events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization (ESAVI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This is a retrospective, mixed-methods (qualitative and quantitative) case study focusing on the work carried out by the pharmacovigilance committee in the years 2021 and 2022. The minutes of committee meetings were used to describe how the committee operates. ESAVI cases discussed and addressed at expert meetings were recorded. The number of vaccine doses applied during the period of analysis, as well as the number of ESAVIs reported within that period, was obtained from statewide information systems. Results: Over 55 pharmacovigilance committee meetings held in 2021-2022, 118 ESAVI cases-most related to COVID-19 vaccines-were discussed. A total of 126,778,252 doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered during this period, with 42,893 ESAVI reported. Among the cases selected for discussion, 71.2% occurred after the first dose of vaccine, 32.8% represented neurological events, and only 5% were deemed to have a causal relationship with the vaccine. Conclusions: The pharmacovigilance committee played a significant role in the ESAVI surveillance system during the period of analysis by assisting in the evaluation of more complex cases. It shows potential to contribute positively to strengthening the immunization program, especially within the safe vaccination system framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.