Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687231›Full record

ReviewQRB discovery2024

The potential of fluorogenicity for single molecule FRET and DyeCycling.

Srijayee Ghosh, Sonja Schmid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in QRB discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Srijayee GhoshDepartment of Chemistry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-1993
Sonja SchmidDepartment of Chemistry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3710-5602

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single Molecule Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (smFRET) is a popular technique to directly observe biomolecular dynamics in real time, offering unique mechanistic insight into proteins, ribozymes, and so forth. However, inevitable photobleaching of the fluorophores puts a stringent limit on the total time a surface-tethered molecule can be monitored, fundamentally limiting the information gain through conventional smFRET measurements. DyeCycling addresses this problem by using reversibly - instead of covalently - coupled FRET fluorophores, through which it can break the photobleaching limit and theoretically provide unlimited observation time. In this perspective paper, we discuss the potential of various fluorogenic strategies to suppress the background fluorescence caused by unbound, freely diffusing fluorophores inherent to the DyeCycling approach. In comparison to nanophotonic background suppression using zero-mode waveguides, the fluorogenic approach would enable DyeCycling experiments on regular glass slides with fluorogenic FRET probes that are quenched in solution and only fluoresce upon target binding. We review a number of fluorogenic approaches and conclude, among other things, that short-range quenching appears promising for realising fluorogenic DyeCycling on regular glass slides. We anticipate that our discussion will be relevant for all single-molecule fluorescence techniques that use reversible fluorophore binding.

Indexed as

conformational dynamicsfluorescencefluorogenicFRETsingle molecule kinetics

Identifiers

PMID39687231
PMCPMC11649375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.