Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687175›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

High neural noise in autism: A hypothesis currently at the nexus of explanatory power.

Pratik Raul, Elise Rowe, Jeroen J A van Boxtel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pratik RaulDiscipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
Elise RoweDiscipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
Jeroen J A van BoxtelDiscipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism is a neurodevelopmental difference associated with specific autistic experiences and characteristics. Early models such as Weak Central Coherence and Enhanced Perceptual Functioning have tried to capture complex autistic behaviours in a single framework, however, these models lacked a neurobiological explanation. Conversely, current neurobiological theories of autism at the cellular and network levels suggest excitation/inhibition imbalances lead to high neural noise (or, a 'noisy brain') but lack a thorough explanation of how autistic behaviours occur. Critically, around 15 years ago, it was proposed that high neural noise in autism produced a stochastic resonance (SR) effect, a phenomenon where optimal amounts of noise improve signal quality. High neural noise can thus capture both the enhanced (through SR) and reduced performance observed in autistic individuals during certain tasks. Here, we provide a review and perspective that positions the "high neural noise" hypothesis in autism as best placed to provide research direction and impetus. Emphasis is placed on evidence for SR in autism, as this promising prediction has not yet been reviewed in the literature. Using this updated approach towards autism, we can explain a spectrum of autistic experiences all through a neurobiological lens. This approach can further aid in developing specific support or services for autism.

Indexed as

AutismEnhanced performanceNeural noiseReduced performanceStochastic resonance

Identifiers

PMID39687175
PMCPMC11648220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.