ArticleHeliyon2024
Peer effect of environmental information disclosure behavior in China:Empirical test based on "Real green" and "Fake green".
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quality of corporate environmental information disclosure is concerned by all sectors of society. Using data on Chinese listed A-share companies in heavy polluting industries from 2015 to 2022, this study examines whether the "quantity" and "quality" dimensions of corporate environmental information disclosure have peer effects in the same region. Further, it compares the mechanism and economic consequences of the "real green" and "fake green" behaviors. The empirical results show that environmental information disclosure has peer effect in both "quantity" and "quality", and the "real green" behavior and "fake green" behavior also exist. Two underlying mechanisms are identified: social learning and competitive imitation mechanisms. Further analysis reveals that the peer effect of "Real green" behavior is derived from the competitive imitation mechanism, and that of "Fake green" behavior is derived from the social learning mechanism. Overall, the peer effect of environmental information disclosure quality weakens the green innovation ability. Further, shows that the peer effect of "Real green" behavior has a positive U-shaped impact on green innovation. Research attention and environmental regulation play a certain role in regulating the peer effect on the quality of environmental information disclosure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.