ReviewHeliyon2024
Global research trends in the teacher evaluation of medical college: A bibliometric and visualized study.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scientometric study of learning circles in medical education: Trends, collaborative networking, and citation dynamics.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The evaluation of education in colleges and universities is not only an essential means to promote teachers' professional development and ensure high-quality development of education but also a strong support for the overall development of colleges and universities. In this study, to understand the development trends and predict the future of teacher evaluation in medical colleges from 2005 to 2023, we conducted a comprehensive bibliometric and visualized study using Web of Science. Methods: The articles on teacher evaluation in medical colleges were extracted from the "Core Collection" of the WoS database. VOSviewer software, CiteSpace and R-Bibliometrix Package were employed to visually analyze countries/regions, journals, authors, keywords, institutions, and highly cited articles in this field. Results: The number of articles on teacher evaluation in medical colleges has gradually increased. The United States has the most significant number of publications in this field. The most frequently used keywords were "medical education," "education," "teaching," "assessment," and "curriculum." BMC Medical Education was the leading journal. The leading institutions were Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and the University of Toronto. Furthermore, Singh T, Roberts C, Riquelme A, Raupach T, and Padilla O published the most papers. Conclusion: This study's results indicate that teacher evaluation in medical colleges remains a significant area of research worldwide. The findings will contribute to the ongoing study of teacher evaluation in medical colleges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.