Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687136›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

The baseline fecal microbiome differs in patients with and without anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery.

Anders Bech Jørgensen, Louise Almer, Jose Alfredo Samaniego Castruita, Martin Schou Pedersen, Nikolai Søren Kirkby, Esther Agnete Jensen, Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez, Lennart Friis-Hansen, Birgitte Brandstrup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anders Bech JørgensenDepartment of Surgery, Part of Copenhagen University Hospitals - Holbæk, Denmark.
Louise AlmerCenter for Translational Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Jose Alfredo Samaniego CastruitaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark.
Martin Schou PedersenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Nikolai Søren KirkbyDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Esther Agnete JensenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Part of Copenhagen University Hospitals - Næstved, Denmark.
Alonzo Alfaro-NúñezDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Part of Copenhagen University Hospitals - Næstved, Denmark.
Lennart Friis-HansenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Birgitte BrandstrupDepartment of Surgery, Part of Copenhagen University Hospitals - Holbæk, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication of colorectal surgery. The risk of AL is affected by both surgery and patient factors. Gut microbiomes can be generated from the residual material from the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). We, therefore, examined if AL after colorectal cancer surgery could be associated with specific baseline microbiomes in the FIT screening sampling tubes collected weeks before surgery. Methods: Samples from patients participating in the Danish colorectal cancer screening program were biobanked from 2016 to 2018, and samples from patients who had surgery for screening-detected cancer were included. They were matched with patients without AL in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, location of anastomosis (colonic/rectal), ASA classification, and smoking habits. Bacterial DNA was extracted from the sampling tubes, and the fecal microbiomes were analyzed with targeted 16S ribosomal RNA third-generation sequencing. Results: 18 patients who developed AL after surgery were matched with 36 without AL. The alpha diversity was lower in the AL group (p = 0.035), and the AL group separated from the Controls in the PCoA plot (p < 0.001). This was due to the patients undergoing rectal resections, with significant differences in alpha- and beta diversity (p = 0.025 and p = 0.002, respectively). The prevalence of bacteria with the potential to produce collagenase was higher in patients who developed AL (odds ratio 1.29 (95% CI 1.28-1.30), p < 0.001). Conclusions: We found differences in the baseline microbiome profile associated with subsequent development of AL after surgery for screening-detected rectal cancer.

Identifiers

PMID39687136
PMCPMC11647948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.