ArticleHeliyon2024
The baseline fecal microbiome differs in patients with and without anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Microbiota Correction to Host Protection: A New Therapeutic Target for the Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Perioperative microbiota at the colorectal anastomosis: local host-microbe interactions in healing and leak.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Beyond colonoscopy, faecal DNA mutation screening provides a potential and viable path to early colorectal cancer detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Differences in gut microbiota among patients with anastomotic leak following colorectal cancer surgery.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication of colorectal surgery. The risk of AL is affected by both surgery and patient factors. Gut microbiomes can be generated from the residual material from the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). We, therefore, examined if AL after colorectal cancer surgery could be associated with specific baseline microbiomes in the FIT screening sampling tubes collected weeks before surgery. Methods: Samples from patients participating in the Danish colorectal cancer screening program were biobanked from 2016 to 2018, and samples from patients who had surgery for screening-detected cancer were included. They were matched with patients without AL in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, location of anastomosis (colonic/rectal), ASA classification, and smoking habits. Bacterial DNA was extracted from the sampling tubes, and the fecal microbiomes were analyzed with targeted 16S ribosomal RNA third-generation sequencing. Results: 18 patients who developed AL after surgery were matched with 36 without AL. The alpha diversity was lower in the AL group (p = 0.035), and the AL group separated from the Controls in the PCoA plot (p < 0.001). This was due to the patients undergoing rectal resections, with significant differences in alpha- and beta diversity (p = 0.025 and p = 0.002, respectively). The prevalence of bacteria with the potential to produce collagenase was higher in patients who developed AL (odds ratio 1.29 (95% CI 1.28-1.30), p < 0.001). Conclusions: We found differences in the baseline microbiome profile associated with subsequent development of AL after surgery for screening-detected rectal cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.