ArticleHeliyon2024
Preimplantation development analysis of aneuploid embryos with different chromosomal abnormalities.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the increasing aneuploidy stress effects on embryo morphokinetic development: non-linear and stage-specific disruption in developmental timing.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The change of morphokinetic pattern in aneuploid embryos will facilitate the non-invasive selection of euploid embryos. In this study, we investigated the impact of different chromosomal abnormalities on the morphokinetic patterns of embryonic development. Methods: Our cohort includes 939 time-lapse preimplantation genetic testing cycles performed between January 2019 and July 2022 at a single academic fertility center, with a total of 2876 biopsied blastocysts. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, time-lapse monitoring, and next-generation sequencing were performed. Results: After adjusting for patient- and cycle-related factors, Conclusions: Our study found that different chromosomal abnormalities have different effects on the morphokinetic parameters. Significant delays in morphokinetic parameters at different stages were found in fragment-mutated embryos and monosomic embryos. This can provide insights into the pre-implantation development pattern of aneuploid embryos and help non-invasive embryo selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.