ArticleHeliyon2024
Research on the mechanism of human-machine security collaboration of miners considering automation trust.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Safety in the coal mining industry is a long-standing issue. With the implementation of intelligent construction in coal mines, humans-machine collaboration is critical to accident prevention. We investigate the psychological dynamics among miners during intelligent construction by developing distinct evolutionary game models for miner security collaboration mechanisms, while also considering the level of trust in automation. We explore the impact of changes in automation trust on the human-machine security collaboration behaviour among miners as well as the regulatory strategies adopted by coal mining enterprises. Evidently, the current level of automation trust among miners is insufficient to ensure safety, and the safety management systems of coal mining enterprises are yet to reach a stable state. Examination of the relevant parameters using specific examples reveals that the optimal range for the level of automation trust among miners lies between 0.7 and 0.9, indicating a favourable coal mine safety production system. These conclusions provide a scientific foundation for effectively enhancing safety management in the context of intelligent construction in coal mines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.