ArticleBrain & spine2024
Pediatric skull base tumors: Clinical features and surgical outcomes; a single center retrospective study with a review of literature.
Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Pediatric intracranial tumors, particularly at the skull base, are rare and present unique challenges to pediatric neurosurgeons and oncologists, owing to their complex anatomy and diverse histopathology. Robust evidence is still marginal concerning their clinical and surgical courses. Our aim is to describe our experience regarding surgical approaches, with special focus on surgical features, postoperative outcomes, adverse events as well as adjuvant therapeutic concepts. Methods: Patients aged <18 years undergoing skull base surgery between 2017 and 2023 at our institution were retrospectively enrolled. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical approach, pre -and postoperative clinical status and adjuvant therapy as well as overall and progression free survival were assessed. Results: Twelve children aged 6.1 ± 4.1 years were analyzed. There was a predominance of the female gender (7/12, 58.4%). Mean tumor diameter was 4.0 ± 2.9 cm. In three children the tumor was located suprasellar, temporobasal in one, adjacent to the cerebellar pontine angle in 4, clival in 3 and petroclival in 2 children. A subfrontal approach was performed in two patients, a subtemporal approach in one, a retrosigmoidal approach in 5 and in one patient two-staged approach; retrosigmoidal and later in a second operation pterional approach was conducted. One clival tumor was removed via an endonasal endoscopic approach and in another case via a transoral endoscopic approach. Gross total resection (GTR) and near total resection were achieved in 7 patients (58.3%). Tumor types included meningioma, clivus-chordoma, epidermoid cyst, anaplastic ependymoma, Ewing's sarcoma and Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor (ATRT) as well as embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR). 4 patients (33.3%) died of disease due to tumor progression in average after 15 months. Hydrocephalus developed in two patients; a ventriculoperitoneal shunt was inserted in one patient, while an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) was performed in the other. Moreover, one child suffered from a residual neurological deficit at last follow-up evaluation. Adjuvant therapy protocols were applied in six patients (50.0%). Conclusion: Skull base tumors in children present a therapeutic challenge due to their rarity and unique pathological composition and can lead to considerable morbidity and mortality. An interdisciplinary approach involving neurosurgeons, pediatric oncologists and radiotherapists is mandatory to guarantee the best clinical course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.