Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687036›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2024

Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Main Trunk and/or Contralateral Portal Vein Invasion in IMbrave150.

Richard S Finn, Peter R Galle, Michel Ducreux, Ann-Lii Cheng, Norelle Reilly, Alan Nicholas, Sairy Hernandez, Ning Ma, Philippe Merle, Riad Salem and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dynamics changes of spleen volume predict survival outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tislelizumab plus lenvatinib.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Richard S FinnJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Peter R GalleUniversity Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Michel DucreuxParis-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy and INSERM-U1279, Collective Invasion, Villejuif, France.
Ann-Lii ChengNational Taiwan University Cancer Center and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Norelle ReillyGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alan NicholasGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sairy HernandezGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ning MaGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Philippe MerleCroix-Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Riad SalemNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Daneng LiCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA.
Valeriy BrederN.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in IMbrave150. Efficacy and safety in patient subpopulations with Vp4 portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and other high-risk prognostic factors are reported. Methods: IMbrave150 was a global, randomized (2:1), open-label, phase 3 study in systemic treatment-naive patients with unresectable HCC; OS and PFS were co-primary endpoints. Exploratory analyses compared the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab 1,200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks versus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily in patients (i) with and without Vp4 PVTT alone and (ii) with and without high-risk prognostic factors. Results: In patients with Vp4 PVTT, median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI: 6.0-13.9) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab ( Conclusion: Regardless of VP4 PVTT or other high-risk features of unresectable HCC, which have often resulted in exclusion from other front-line trials, patients benefited from atezolizumab and bevacizumab versus sorafenib.

Indexed as

High-risk prognostic factorsImmunotherapyPD-L1 inhibitorPortal vein tumor thrombosisVp4

Identifiers

PMID39687036
PMCPMC11649257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.