ArticleLiver cancer2024
Clinical Utility of the Novel Oncological Criteria of Resectability for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Liver cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additive value of oncological resectability criteria for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Anatomic-Biologic Borderline Resectability Criteria Improve Recurrence Risk Stratification in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Surgical Outcomes and Recurrence Management in Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Implications for Multidisciplinary Strategies.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Oncological Outcomes and Treatment Strategies for Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on the Oncological Resectability Classification.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- Current Status of Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Advanced Systemic Therapies.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Prognostic Stratification of Initial Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using a Modified Borderline Resectable Classification.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Oncological Resectability Criteria for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Preoperative Framework for Multidisciplinary Management.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Survival impact and recurrence prediction using oncologic resectability classification in hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatic resection: a Japanese multi-center study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Decision-Making Biomarkers Guiding Therapeutic Strategies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Prediction to Personalized Care.Cancers · 2025Review
- Surgical Outcomes of Lenvatinib Treatment Followed by Liver Resection for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Larger than 10 cm.Cancers · 2025Article
- Tumor burden score and borderline resectability criteria as predictors of survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- Treatment outcomes of hepatectomy and systemic chemotherapy based on oncological resectability criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Introduction of new systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has led to the development of new oncological criteria of resectability for the resectability of HCC. This study was aimed at validating the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of the resectability classification based on the novel criteria in real-world clinical practice. Methods: This study was conducted in 1,822 patients who had undergone curative resection for HCC (population 1) and 107 patients with unresectable disease who had received lenvatinib therapy (population 2). Patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2), and the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of this classification based on the novel criteria were examined. Results: Multivariate analysis confirmed that classification of the patients according to the oncological resectability criteria was significantly correlated with the overall survival (OS) (BR1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.38-2.55; BR2: HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 3.01-5.65) and recurrence-free survival (BR1: HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.44-2.41; BR2: HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.71-4.82) in population 1. In population 2, the resectability classification was correlated with the rates of successful additional intervention (surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, or radiotherapy) (BR1 65.7% vs. BR2 42.3%, Conclusion: The resectability classification based on the novel oncological criteria for resectability showed acceptable prognosticating ability in both surgically and medically treated populations with advanced HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.