Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687034›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2024

Clinical Utility of the Novel Oncological Criteria of Resectability for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Junichi Shindoh, Yusuke Kawamura, Keiichi Akahoshi, Masaru Matsumura, Satoshi Okubo, Norio Akuta, Minoru Tanabe, Norihiro Kokudo, Yoshiyuki Suzuki, Masaji Hashimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Junichi ShindohDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hepatobiliary-pancreatic Surgery Division, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke KawamuraDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi AkahoshiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaru MatsumuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hepatobiliary-pancreatic Surgery Division, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi OkuboDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hepatobiliary-pancreatic Surgery Division, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio AkutaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru TanabeDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Norihiro KokudoDepartment of Surgery, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki SuzukiDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaji HashimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hepatobiliary-pancreatic Surgery Division, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Introduction of new systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has led to the development of new oncological criteria of resectability for the resectability of HCC. This study was aimed at validating the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of the resectability classification based on the novel criteria in real-world clinical practice. Methods: This study was conducted in 1,822 patients who had undergone curative resection for HCC (population 1) and 107 patients with unresectable disease who had received lenvatinib therapy (population 2). Patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2), and the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of this classification based on the novel criteria were examined. Results: Multivariate analysis confirmed that classification of the patients according to the oncological resectability criteria was significantly correlated with the overall survival (OS) (BR1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.38-2.55; BR2: HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 3.01-5.65) and recurrence-free survival (BR1: HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.44-2.41; BR2: HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.71-4.82) in population 1. In population 2, the resectability classification was correlated with the rates of successful additional intervention (surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, or radiotherapy) (BR1 65.7% vs. BR2 42.3%, Conclusion: The resectability classification based on the novel oncological criteria for resectability showed acceptable prognosticating ability in both surgically and medically treated populations with advanced HCC.

Indexed as

Consensus statementHepatocellular carcinomaResectabilitySurgerySystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID39687034
PMCPMC11649256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.