ArticleiScience2024
Multimodal integration to identify the invasion status of lung adenocarcinoma intraoperatively.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated CT Radiomics and Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis in Predicting Lung Adenocarcinoma Invasion: A Dual-Center Study with Implications for Personalized Treatment.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
- Enhancing Chest X-ray Diagnosis with a Multimodal Deep Learning Network by Integrating Clinical History to Refine Attention.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Imaging Features of Lung Ground-Glass Nodules and Their Correlation With Biological Behavior.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma is crucial for determining the appropriate surgical strategy, impacting postoperative outcomes. This study developed a multimodality model combining radiomics, intraoperative frozen section (FS) pathology, and clinical indicators to predict invasion status. The study enrolled 1,424 patients from two hospitals, divided into multimodal training, radiology testing, and pathology testing cohorts. A prospective validation cohort of 114 patients was selected between March and May 2023. The radiomics + pathology + clinical indicators multimodality model (multi-RPC model) achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.921 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.899-0.939) in the multimodal training cohort and 0.939 (95% CI 0.878-0.975) in the validation cohort, outperforming single- and dual-modality models. The multi-RPC model's predictive accuracy of 0.860 (95% CI 0.782-0.918) suggests that it could significantly reduce inappropriate surgical procedures, enhancing precision oncology by integrating multimodal information to guide surgical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.