Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686957›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

TEleRehabilitation foR Aphasia (TERRA) phase II trial design.

Christy Cassarly, Alexandra Basilakos, Lisa Johnson, Janina Wilmskoetter, Jordan Elm, Argye E Hillis, Leonardo Bonilha, Chris Rorden, Gregory Hickok, Dirk-Bart den Ouden and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christy CassarlyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Alexandra BasilakosDepartment of Communications Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Lisa JohnsonDepartment of Communications Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Janina WilmskoetterDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Jordan ElmDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Argye E HillisDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Leonardo BonilhaDepartment of Communications Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Chris RordenDepartment of Communications Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Gregory HickokDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Dirk-Bart den OudenDepartment of Communications Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Julius FridrikssonDepartment of Communications Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Despite comprehensive evidence that supports the utility of aphasia therapy in persons with chronic (≥6 months) stroke-induced aphasia, the amount of therapy provided to patients in the United States is typically far less than what is likely necessary to maximize recovery. Two potential contributors to this discrepancy are limited access to rehabilitation services due to the availability of providers and logistical difficulties with transportation. One way to increase access to aphasia therapy is to rely on telerehabilitation. Methods: The TEleRehabilitation foR Aphasia (TERRA) trial is a prospective, randomized, rater-blinded, multicenter phase II non-inferiority trial to evaluate telerehabilitation for aphasia therapy in persons with chronic post-stroke aphasia. Participants are randomized (1:1) to receive either aphasia remote therapy or in-clinic therapy for 30 total days of treatment (15 days of a semantically focused approach and 15 days of a phonologically focused approach) for 45 min per day. A total of 100 adults (ages 21-80) with a history of left hemisphere ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke incurred at least 12 months prior to study enrollment will be randomized. The trial will be conducted at the clinical research facilities at two sites: the Medical University of South Carolina and the University of South Carolina. Conclusions: This paper details the design of the TERRA trial, which aims to test whether aphasia therapy delivered by a remote speech-language pathologist through videoconferencing (i.e., via telerehabilitation) is not clinically worse than in-clinic therapy for individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia to provide an opportunity to move to a definitive phase III trial.

Indexed as

AphasiaNon-fluent speechRandomized controlled trialSpeech productionStudy design

Identifiers

PMID39686957
PMCPMC11648797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.