ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024
TEleRehabilitation foR Aphasia (TERRA) phase II trial design.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and purpose: Despite comprehensive evidence that supports the utility of aphasia therapy in persons with chronic (≥6 months) stroke-induced aphasia, the amount of therapy provided to patients in the United States is typically far less than what is likely necessary to maximize recovery. Two potential contributors to this discrepancy are limited access to rehabilitation services due to the availability of providers and logistical difficulties with transportation. One way to increase access to aphasia therapy is to rely on telerehabilitation. Methods: The TEleRehabilitation foR Aphasia (TERRA) trial is a prospective, randomized, rater-blinded, multicenter phase II non-inferiority trial to evaluate telerehabilitation for aphasia therapy in persons with chronic post-stroke aphasia. Participants are randomized (1:1) to receive either aphasia remote therapy or in-clinic therapy for 30 total days of treatment (15 days of a semantically focused approach and 15 days of a phonologically focused approach) for 45 min per day. A total of 100 adults (ages 21-80) with a history of left hemisphere ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke incurred at least 12 months prior to study enrollment will be randomized. The trial will be conducted at the clinical research facilities at two sites: the Medical University of South Carolina and the University of South Carolina. Conclusions: This paper details the design of the TERRA trial, which aims to test whether aphasia therapy delivered by a remote speech-language pathologist through videoconferencing (i.e., via telerehabilitation) is not clinically worse than in-clinic therapy for individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia to provide an opportunity to move to a definitive phase III trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.