Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686950›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2024

Medicare reimbursement for interventional pain procedures: 2000 to 2023.

Alexander M Park, Aditya Khurana, Roger R Wang, Adam E M Eltorai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander M ParkNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.
Aditya KhuranaMayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Roger R WangPalo Pinto General Hospital, USA.
Adam E M EltoraiBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An analysis of the financial trends of Interventional Pain (IP) procedures in the United States is lacking. Understanding these relations is necessary to help optimize future IP care delivery and costs. Objective: To examine Medicare reimbursement trends for IP procedures in both facility and non-facility settings. Methods: Utilizing the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, reimbursement data for 32 of the most performed IP procedures was collected between 2000 and 2023 for both facility and non-facility clinical sites. After adjusting for inflation, annual change, total percent change, and compound annual growth rate (CAGR) were calculated for each procedure. Results: Following inflation adjustments, the average reimbursement rate decreased by an average of 61.31 % for facility procedures over the study period and by 60.40 % for non-facility procedures. The average adjusted reimbursement rate for facility procedures decreased by $6.76 per year with an average CAGR of -4.38 %, while the average adjusted reimbursement rate for non-facility procedures decreased by $18.66 per year with an average CAGR of -4.48 %. A two-tailed Conclusion: Medicare reimbursement rates in both facility and non-facility settings have decreased from 2000 to 2023, with non-facility procedures experiencing a significantly larger decrease.

Indexed as

Interventional painMedicareReimbursementTrends

Identifiers

PMID39686950
PMCPMC11648747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.