ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Dependence of brain-tissue R
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human In Vivo Validation of Frequency-Dependent QTI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Mesoscale Whole-Brain TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Imaging of Embryonic and Fetal Brain Development Using MRI Microscopy: Achieving High Spatial Resolution.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- In-vivo histology of Parkinson's disease using quantitative multiparametric mapping.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Magnetization transfer imaging using non-balanced SSFP at ultra-low field.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Quantum magnetization exchange through transient hydrogen bond matrix defines magnetic resonance signal relaxation and anisotropy in central nervous system.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dependence of brain-tissue RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- High-resolution quantitative TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo quantify T
methodsNine subjects were scanned at both field strengths with the same acquisition technique, which used multiple gradient-echo sampling of a spin echo. This allowed for separation of T
resultsThe relationship between the R
conclusionThe R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.