Observational studyAnnals of transplantation2024
Effect of Medical Accessibility on Long-Term Survival in Liver Transplantation.
Observational study in Annals of transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mathematical Modeling of Liver Metabolic Activity Under Ex Vivo Conditions upon Exposure to Magnetic Nanoparticles.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Geographical Accessibility Does Not Affect Prognosis After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Association Between Distance to the Transplant Center and Survival Following Living Donor Liver Transplantation.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical accessibility is important in liver transplantation (LT) because of the risk of infections associated with the use of immunosuppressants and complications that require continuous treatment, such as biliary stenosis. However, the effect of medical accessibility on LT success rates has yet to be scrutinized. The aim of this retrospective observational study is to determine whether medical accessibility affects LT outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled patients who had undergone LT at Samsung Medical Center between January 2017 and December 2021. The level of medical access was divided into 2 categories (difficult and easy) based on a cutoff of a 120-min commute on public transportation to access LT. Baseline characteristics were calibrated with propensity score matching. The outcomes (overall survival and graft survival) and severity of emergency center visits according to medical accessibility were also investigated. RESULTS A total of 486 patients was included in this study. The median time to reach the hospital by public transportation was 135 min. Sex, Child-Pugh classification, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, and donor type were calibrated with propensity score matching, and each group consisted of 186 patients. The overall survival (88.3% vs 86.2%, P=0.67, 5-year) and graft survival (98.6% vs 95.4%, P=0.086, 5-year) showed no significant differences between the difficult-to-access and easy-to-access groups. While severity of emergency center visits differed between the difficult group (27.6%) and the easy group (15.5%), the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Medical access to LT did tend to increase emergency center presentation severity but did not affect long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.