Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686401›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Potato Late Blight Outbreak: A Study on Advanced Classification Models Based on Meteorological Data.

Parama Bagchi, Barbara Sawicka, Zoran Stamenkovic, Dušan Marković, Debotosh Bhattacharjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing Technology in Potato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parama BagchiDepartment of CSE, RCC Institute of Information Technology, Beliaghata, Kolkata 700015, India.
Barbara SawickaDepartment of Plant Production Technology and Commodity Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8183-7624
Zoran StamenkovicInstitute of Computer Science, University of Potsdam, An der Bahn 2, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6078-413X
Dušan MarkovićFaculty of Agronomy in Čačak, University of Kragujevac, 32000 Čačak, Serbia.
Debotosh BhattacharjeeDepartment of CSE, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India.

Funding

German Federal Ministry for Education and Research 16DHBKIO20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While past research has emphasized the importance of late blight infection detection and classification, anticipating the potato late blight infection is crucial from the economic point of view as it helps to significantly reduce the production cost. Furthermore, it is necessary to minimize the exposure of potatoes to harmful chemicals and pesticides due to their potential adverse effects on the human immune system. Our work is based on the precise classification of late blight infections in potatoes in European countries using real-time data from 1980 to 2000. To predict the potato late blight outbreak, we incorporated several hybrid machine learning models, as well as a unique combination of stacking classifier and logistic regression, achieving the highest prediction accuracy of 87.22%. Further enhancements of these models and the use of new data sources may lead to a higher late blight prediction accuracy and, consequently, a higher efficiency in managing potatoes' health.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksMachine LearningPlant DiseasesSolanum tuberosumHumansLogistic ModelsPhytophthora infestansagricultural forecastingcrop health managementlogistic regressionmachine learningmeteorological dataplant pathologypotato late blightprediction modelsstacking classifier

Identifiers

PMID39686401
PMCPMC11644959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.