ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Hierarchical-Based Learning Approach for Multi-Action Intent Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent applications of wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) for predicting human movement have often entailed estimating action-level (e.g., walking, running, jumping) and joint-level (e.g., ankle plantarflexion angle) motion. Although action-level or joint-level information is frequently the focus of movement intent prediction, contextual information is necessary for a more thorough approach to intent recognition. Therefore, a combination of action-level and joint-level information may offer a more comprehensive approach to predicting movement intent. In this study, we devised a novel hierarchical-based method combining action-level classification and subsequent joint-level regression to predict joint angles 100 ms into the future. K-nearest neighbors (KNN), bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and temporal convolutional network (TCN) models were employed for action-level classification, and a random forest model trained on action-specific IMU data was used for joint-level prediction. A joint-level action-generic model trained on multiple actions (e.g., backward walking, kneeling down, kneeling up, running, and walking) was also used for predicting the joint angle. Compared with a hierarchical-based approach, the action-generic model had lower prediction error for backward walking, kneeling down, and kneeling up. Although the TCN and BiLSTM classifiers achieved classification accuracies of 89.87% and 89.30%, respectively, they did not surpass the performance of the action-generic random forest model when used in combination with an action-specific random forest model. This may have been because the action-generic approach was trained on more data from multiple actions. This study demonstrates the advantage of leveraging large, disparate data sources over a hierarchical-based approach for joint-level prediction. Moreover, it demonstrates the efficacy of an IMU-driven, task-agnostic model in predicting future joint angles across multiple actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.