Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686385›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Improving the Calibration of Low-Cost Sensors Using Data Assimilation.

Diego Alberto Aranda Britez, Alejandro Tapia Córdoba, Princy Johnson, Erid Eulogio Pacheco Viana, Pablo Millán Gata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diego Alberto Aranda BritezDepartment of Engineering, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Avda. de las Universidades, s/n, Dos Hermanas, 41704 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8603-3000
Alejandro Tapia CórdobaDepartment of Engineering, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Avda. de las Universidades, s/n, Dos Hermanas, 41704 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3380-3120
Princy JohnsonSchool of Engineering, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2379-9700
Erid Eulogio Pacheco VianaDepartment of Engineering, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Avda. de las Universidades, s/n, Dos Hermanas, 41704 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-8590-9536
Pablo Millán GataDepartment of Engineering, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Avda. de las Universidades, s/n, Dos Hermanas, 41704 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6129-0094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of smart agriculture, accurate soil moisture monitoring is crucial to optimise irrigation, improve water usage efficiency and increase crop yields. Although low-cost capacitive sensors are used to make monitoring affordable, these sensors face accuracy challenges that often result in inefficient irrigation practices. This paper presents a method for calibrating capacitive soil moisture sensors through data assimilation. The method was validated using data collected from a farm in Dos Hermanas, Seville, Spain, which utilises a drip irrigation system. The proposed solution integrates the Hydrus 1D model with particle filter (PF) and the Iterative Ensemble Smoother (IES) to continuously update and refine the model and sensor calibration parameters. The methodology includes the implementation of physical constraints, ensuring that the updated parameters remain within physically plausible ranges. Soil moisture was measured using low-cost SoilWatch 10 capacitive sensors and ThetaProbe ML3 high-precision sensors as a reference. Furthermore, a comparison was carried out between the PF and IES methods. The results demonstrate that the data assimilation approach markedly enhances the precision of sensor readings, aligning them closely with reference measurements and model simulations. The PF method demonstrated superior performance, achieving an 84.8% improvement in accuracy compared to the raw sensor readings. This substantial improvement was measured against high-precision reference sensors, confirming the effectiveness of the PF method in calibrating low-cost capacitive sensors. In contrast, the IES method showed a 68% improvement in accuracy, which, while still considerable, was outperformed by the PF. By effectively mitigating observation noise and sensor biases, this approach proves robust and practical for large-scale implementations in precision agriculture.

Indexed as

calibrationdata assimilationsoil moisture sensors

Identifiers

PMID39686385
PMCPMC11644909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.