ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Steps to Facilitate the Use of Clinical Gait Analysis in Stroke Patients: The Validation of a Single 2D RGB Smartphone Video-Based System for Gait Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- VisionMD-Gait: scalable clinical gait assessment from smartphone videos.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Validation of AI-based markerless gait event detection during perturbed walking using smartphone videos from two camera perspectives.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Validity of AI-Driven Markerless Motion Capture for Spatiotemporal Gait Analysis in Stroke Survivors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Relation Between Hemiparetic Gait Patterns and Walking Function After Stroke, as Measured with Wearable Sensors.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Observational
- Vision-Based Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Decline: Correlating Gait Variance with SPPB Performance.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of lower limb kinematic and kinetic estimation during athlete jumping between markerless and marker-based motion capture systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical gait analysis plays a central role in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. However, practical and technical challenges limit their use in clinical settings. This study aimed to validate SMARTGAIT, a deep learning-based gait analysis system that addresses these limitations. Eight stroke patients took part in the study at the Human Performance Research Centre of the University of Konstanz. Gait measurements were taken using both the marker-based Vicon motion capture system and the single-smartphone-based SMARTGAIT system. We evaluated the agreement for knee, hip, and ankle joint angle kinematics in the frontal and sagittal plane and spatiotemporal gait parameters between the two systems. The results mostly demonstrated high levels of agreement between the two systems, with Pearson correlations of ≥0.79 for all lower body angle kinematics in the sagittal plane and correlations of ≥0.71 in the frontal plane. RMSE values were ≤4.6°. The intraclass correlation coefficients for all derived gait parameters showed good to excellent levels of agreement. SMARTGAIT is a promising tool for gait analysis in stroke, particularly for quantifying gait characteristics in the sagittal plane, which is very relevant for clinical gait analysis. However, further analyses are required to validate the use of SMARTGAIT in larger samples and its transferability to different types of pathological gait. In conclusion, a single smartphone recording (monocular 2D RGB camera) could make gait analysis more accessible in clinical settings, potentially simplifying the process and making it more feasible for therapists and doctors to use in their day-to-day practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.