Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686356›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Steps to Facilitate the Use of Clinical Gait Analysis in Stroke Patients: The Validation of a Single 2D RGB Smartphone Video-Based System for Gait Analysis.

Philipp Barzyk, Alina-Sophie Boden, Justin Howaldt, Jana Stürner, Philip Zimmermann, Daniel Seebacher, Joachim Liepert, Manuel Stein, Markus Gruber, Michael Schwenk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Philipp BarzykHuman Performance Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0844-4533
Alina-Sophie BodenHuman Performance Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-0736-0511
Justin HowaldtHuman Performance Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-5936-0156
Jana StürnerLurija Institute and Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, 78476 Allensbach, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-8662-7934
Philip ZimmermannSubsequent GmbH, 78467 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-4804-7586
Daniel SeebacherSubsequent GmbH, 78467 Konstanz, Germany.
Joachim LiepertLurija Institute and Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, 78476 Allensbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1383-2346
Manuel SteinSubsequent GmbH, 78467 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7198-1438
Markus GruberHuman Performance Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0233-3912
Michael SchwenkHuman Performance Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2002-2656

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 16SV9000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical gait analysis plays a central role in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. However, practical and technical challenges limit their use in clinical settings. This study aimed to validate SMARTGAIT, a deep learning-based gait analysis system that addresses these limitations. Eight stroke patients took part in the study at the Human Performance Research Centre of the University of Konstanz. Gait measurements were taken using both the marker-based Vicon motion capture system and the single-smartphone-based SMARTGAIT system. We evaluated the agreement for knee, hip, and ankle joint angle kinematics in the frontal and sagittal plane and spatiotemporal gait parameters between the two systems. The results mostly demonstrated high levels of agreement between the two systems, with Pearson correlations of ≥0.79 for all lower body angle kinematics in the sagittal plane and correlations of ≥0.71 in the frontal plane. RMSE values were ≤4.6°. The intraclass correlation coefficients for all derived gait parameters showed good to excellent levels of agreement. SMARTGAIT is a promising tool for gait analysis in stroke, particularly for quantifying gait characteristics in the sagittal plane, which is very relevant for clinical gait analysis. However, further analyses are required to validate the use of SMARTGAIT in larger samples and its transferability to different types of pathological gait. In conclusion, a single smartphone recording (monocular 2D RGB camera) could make gait analysis more accessible in clinical settings, potentially simplifying the process and making it more feasible for therapists and doctors to use in their day-to-day practice.

Indexed as

GaitGait AnalysisSmartphoneStrokeAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke Rehabilitationgait analysishuman movement analysisjoint kinematicsmarkerless motion captureRGB camerastroke

Identifiers

PMID39686356
PMCPMC11644854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.