ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Optimising Concrete Crack Detection: A Study of Transfer Learning with Application on Nvidia Jetson Nano.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- UAV and Deep Learning for Building Façade Defect Detection: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- YOLO-Crack: Geometry-Guided Real-Time Crack Detection Framework Toward Edge Deployment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to detect defects such as concrete cracks in civil and transport infrastructure has the potential to make inspections less expensive, quicker, safer and more objective by reducing the need for on-site human labour. One deployment scenario involves using a drone to carry an embedded device and camera, with the device making localised predictions at the edge about the existence of defects using a trained convolutional neural network (CNN) for image classification. In this paper, we trained six CNNs, namely Resnet18, Resnet50, GoogLeNet, MobileNetV2, MobileNetV3-Small and MobileNetV3-Large, using transfer learning technology to classify images of concrete structures as containing a crack or not. To enhance the model's robustness, the original dataset, comprising 3000 images of concrete structures, was augmented using salt and pepper noise, as well as motion blur, separately. The results show that Resnet50 generally provides the highest validation accuracy (96% with the original dataset and a batch size of 16) and the highest validation F1-score (95% with the original dataset and a batch size of 16). The trained model was then deployed on an Nvidia Jetson Nano device for real-time inference, demonstrating its capability to accurately detect cracks in both laboratory and field settings. This study highlights the potential of using transfer learning on Edge AI devices for Structural Health Monitoring, providing a cost-effective and efficient solution for automated crack detection in concrete structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.