ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Identifying Infant Body Position from Inertial Sensors with Machine Learning: Which Parameters Matter?
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Body position classification using wearable sensors in infants with cerebral palsy.Infant behavior & development · 2026Article
- Lightweight Multi-Scale Framework for Human Pose and Action Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Vocalisations are coupled with movement of all limbs throughout infancy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Methods in Posture-Related Applications in Children up to 12 Years Old: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Frequency-Dependent Amplification of Head Motion in Infant Rockers: A Segmental IMU-Based Signal Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficient classification of body position is crucial for monitoring infants' motor development. It may fast-track the early detection of developmental issues related not only to the acquisition of motor milestones but also to postural stability and movement patterns. In turn, this may facilitate and enhance opportunities for early intervention that are crucial for promoting healthy growth and development. The manual classification of human body position based on video recordings is labour-intensive, leading to the adoption of Inertial Motion Unit (IMU) sensors. IMUs measure acceleration, angular velocity, and magnetic field intensity, enabling the automated classification of body position. Many research teams are currently employing supervised machine learning classifiers that utilise hand-crafted features for data segment classification. In this study, we used a longitudinal dataset of IMU recordings made in the lab in three different play activities of infants aged 4-12 months. The classification was conducted based on manually annotated video recordings. We found superior performance of the CatBoost Classifier over the Random Forest Classifier in the task of classifying five positions based on IMU sensor data from infants, yielding excellent classification accuracy of the Supine (97.7%), Sitting (93.5%), and Prone (89.9%) positions. Moreover, using data ablation experiments and analysing the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values, the study assessed the importance of various groups of features from both the time and frequency domains. The results highlight that both accelerometer and magnetometer data, especially their statistical characteristics, are critical contributors to improving the accuracy of body position classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.