SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Arabic Sign Language Recognition: A Decade Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dimensionality Reduction for Offline Alphabet Arabic Sign Language Recognition using Deep Learning.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026Article
- Towards a Lightweight Arabic Sign Language Translation System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sign language (SL) is a means of communication that is used to bridge the gap between the deaf, hearing-impaired, and others. For Arabic speakers who are hard of hearing or deaf, Arabic Sign Language (ArSL) is a form of nonverbal communication. The development of effective Arabic sign language recognition (ArSLR) tools helps facilitate this communication, especially for people who are not familiar with ArSLR. Although researchers have investigated various machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods and techniques that affect the performance of ArSLR systems, a systematic review of these methods is lacking. The objectives of this study are to present a comprehensive overview of research on ArSL recognition and present insights from previous research papers. In this study, a systematic literature review of ArSLR based on ML/DL methods and techniques published between 2014 and 2023 is conducted. Three online databases are used: Web of Science (WoS), IEEE Xplore, and Scopus. Each study has undergone the proper screening processes, which include inclusion and exclusion criteria. Throughout this systematic review, PRISMA guidelines have been appropriately followed and applied. The results of this screening are divided into two parts: analysis of all the datasets utilized in the reviewed papers, underscoring their characteristics and importance, and discussion of the ML/DL techniques' potential and limitations. From the 56 articles included in this study, it was noticed that most of the research papers focus on fingerspelling and isolated word recognition rather than continuous sentence recognition, and the vast majority of them are vision-based approaches. The challenges remaining in the field and future research directions in this area of study are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.