Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686274›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Unbiased Feature Estimation Network for Few-Shot Fine-Grained Image Classification.

Jiale Wang, Jin Lu, Junpo Yang, Meijia Wang, Weichuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiale WangSchool of Electronic Information and Artificial Intelligence, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710000, China.
Jin LuSchool of Electronic Information and Artificial Intelligence, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710000, China.
Junpo YangSchool of Electronic Information and Artificial Intelligence, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710000, China.
Meijia WangSchool of Electronic Information and Artificial Intelligence, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710000, China.
Weichuan ZhangSchool of Electronic Information and Artificial Intelligence, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4904-1826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few-shot fine-grained image classification (FSFGIC) aims to classify subspecies with similar appearances under conditions of very limited data. In this paper, we observe an interesting phenomenon: different types of image data augmentation techniques have varying effects on the performance of FSFGIC methods. This indicates that there may be biases in the features extracted from the input images. The bias of the acquired feature may cause deviation in the calculation of similarity, which is particularly detrimental to FSFGIC tasks characterized by low inter-class variation and high intra-class variation, thus affecting the classification accuracy. To address the problems mentioned, we propose an unbiased feature estimation network. The designed network has the capability to significantly optimize the quality of the obtained feature representations and effectively reduce the feature bias from input images. Furthermore, our proposed architecture can be easily integrated into any contextual training mechanism. Extensive experiments on the FSFGIC tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, showing a notable improvement in classification accuracy.

Indexed as

data augmentation techniquesfew-shot fine-grained image classificationunbiased feature estimation network

Identifiers

PMID39686274
PMCPMC11644890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.