Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686264›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessing Locomotive Syndrome Through Instrumented Five-Time Sit-to-Stand Test and Machine Learning.

Iman Hosseini, Maryam Ghahramani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Iman HosseiniSchool of Computing, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-1714-333X
Maryam GhahramaniHuman-Centred Technology Research Centre, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8324-3870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locomotive syndrome (LS) refers to a condition where individuals face challenges in performing activities of daily living. Early detection of such deterioration is crucial to reduce the need for nursing care. The Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25), a 25-question assessment, has been proposed for categorizing individuals into different stages of LS. However, its subjectivity has prompted interest in technology-based quantitative assessments. In this study, we utilized machine learning and an instrumented five-time sit-to-stand test (FTSTS) to assess LS stages. Younger and older participants were recruited, with older individuals classified into LS stages 0-2 based on their GLFS-25 scores. Equipped with a single inertial measurement unit at the pelvis level, participants performed the FTSTS. Using acceleration data, 144 features were extracted, and seven distinct machine learning models were developed using the features. Remarkably, the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model demonstrated superior performance. Following data augmentation and principal component analysis (PCA), the MLP+PCA model achieved an accuracy of 0.9, a precision of 0.92, a recall of 0.9, and an F1 score of 0.91. This underscores the efficacy of the approach for LS assessment. This study lays the foundation for the future development of a remote LS assessment system using commonplace devices like smartphones.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingMachine LearningAccelerometryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLocomotionMaleMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisSitting PositionSyndromeYoung Adultinertial measurement unitlocomotive syndromemachine learningsit to stand

Identifiers

PMID39686264
PMCPMC11645027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.