ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Impact of Power and Time in Hepatic Microwave Ablation: Effect of Different Energy Delivery Schemes.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microwave ablation often involves the use of continuous energy-delivery protocols with a fixed power and time. To achieve larger ablation zones, a range of protocols and power levels have been studied in experimental studies. The objective of the present study was to develop and experimentally evaluate the performance of a coupled computational electromagnetic-bioheat transfer model of 2.45 GHz microwave ablation under a variety of continuous and pulsed power delivery schemes. The main aim was to obtain an in-depth knowledge of the influence of energy delivery settings on ablation zone profiles and thermal damage in the peri-ablation zone. In addition to the theoretical model, we evaluated the power delivery schemes using ex vivo experiments and compared them to previously published data from in vivo experiments. The results showed slight differences in terms of the ablation zone size for different power delivery schemes under ex vivo conditions, with the applied energy level being the most important factor that determines ablation zone size; however, under in vivo conditions, applying a high-power pulse prior to and following a longer constant power application (BOOKEND 95 W protocol) presented the most favorable ablation zones. Moreover, the modeling and experimental studies identified threshold applied power and ablation times beyond which increases did not yield substantive increases in ablation zone extents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.