Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686240›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

CNN-Based Kidney Segmentation Using a Modified CLAHE Algorithm.

Abror Shavkatovich Buriboev, Ahmadjon Khashimov, Akmal Abduvaitov, Heung Seok Jeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abror Shavkatovich BuriboevDepartment of AI-Software, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8024-6200
Ahmadjon KhashimovDepartment of Digital Technologies and Mathematics, Kokand University, Kokand 150700, Uzbekistan.
Akmal AbduvaitovDepartment of IT, Samarkand Branch of Tashkent University of Information Technologies, Samarkand 100084, Uzbekistan.
Heung Seok JeonDepartment of Computer Engineering, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3672-9568

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00412141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an enhanced approach to kidney segmentation using a modified CLAHE preprocessing method, aimed at improving image clarity and CNN performance on the KiTS19 dataset. To assess the impact of the modified CLAHE method, we conducted quality evaluations using the BRISQUE metric, comparing the original, standard CLAHE and modified CLAHE versions of the dataset. The BRISQUE score decreased from 28.8 in the original dataset to 21.1 with the modified CLAHE method, indicating a significant improvement in image quality. Furthermore, CNN segmentation accuracy rose from 0.951 with the original dataset to 0.996 with the modified CLAHE method, outperforming the accuracy achieved with standard CLAHE preprocessing (0.969). These results highlight the benefits of the modified CLAHE method in refining image quality and enhancing segmentation performance. This study highlights the value of adaptive preprocessing in medical imaging workflows and shows that CNN-based kidney segmentation accuracy may be greatly increased by altering conventional CLAHE. Our method provides insightful information on optimizing preprocessing for medical imaging applications, leading to more accurate and dependable segmentation results for better clinical diagnosis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidneyNeural Networks, ComputerHumansCNNimage enhancementkidney segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39686240
PMCPMC11644871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.