Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686235›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Satellite Fingerprinting Methods for GNSS Spoofing Detection.

Francisco Gallardo, Antonio Pérez-Yuste, Andriy Konovaltsev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francisco GallardoETSI Sistemas de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28031 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4618-5309
Antonio Pérez-YusteETSI Sistemas de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28031 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3503-5065
Andriy KonovaltsevInstitute of Communications and Navigation, German Aerospace Center (DLR), 51147 Köln, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-1876-579X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spoofing attacks pose a significant security risk for organizations and systems relying on global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) for their operations. While the existing spoofing detection methods have shown some effectiveness, these can be vulnerable to certain attacks, such as secure code estimation and replay (SCER) attacks, among others.This paper analyzes the potential of satellite fingerprinting methods for GNSS spoofing detection and benchmarks their performance using real (in realistic scenarios by using GPS and Galileo signals generated and recorded in the advanced GNSS simulation facility of DLR) GNSS signals and scenarios. Our results show that our proposed fingerprinting methods can improve the detection accuracy of the existing methods and can be coupled with other techniques to enhance the overall performance of the detection systems, all based on relatively simple metrics. In this paper, we compare the performance of several fingerprinting methods, including those from the existing literature (based on signal Gaussian properties of the signal complex envelope, energy and in-phase symbol dispersion) and one proposed in this paper, based on the satellite instrumental delay. The innovation of this work is a new jamming and spoofing complementary detection technique, based on fingerprinting and machine learning, including a new fingerprinting metric (based on the satellite instrumental delay).

Indexed as

estimationGalileoglobal navigation satellite systemmachine learningsatellite fingerprintingsatellitesSCER

Identifiers

PMID39686235
PMCPMC11644856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.