Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686218›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

SURABHI: Self-Training Using Rectified Annotations-Based Hard Instances for Eidetic Cattle Recognition.

Manu Ramesh, Amy R Reibman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manu RameshSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1567-9011
Amy R ReibmanSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1859-1091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a self-training scheme, SURABHI, that trains deep-learning keypoint detection models on machine-annotated instances, together with the methodology to generate those instances. SURABHI aims to improve the keypoint detection accuracy not by altering the structure of a deep-learning-based keypoint detector model but by generating highly effective training instances. The machine-annotated instances used in SURABHI are hard instances-instances that require a rectifier to correct the keypoints misplaced by the keypoint detection model. We engineer this scheme for the task of predicting keypoints of cattle from the top, in conjunction with our Eidetic Cattle Recognition System, which is dependent on accurate prediction of keypoints for predicting the correct cow ID. We show that the final cow ID prediction accuracy on previously unseen cows also improves significantly after applying SURABHI to a deep-learning detection model with high capacity, especially when available training data are minimal. SURABHI helps us achieve a top-6 cow recognition accuracy of 91.89% on a dataset of cow videos. Using SURABHI on this dataset also improves the number of cow instances with correct identification by 22% over the baseline result from fully supervised training.

Indexed as

cattle recognitionhard instanceskeypoint detectionself-training

Identifiers

PMID39686218
PMCPMC11644942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.