Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686203›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Minimum Number of Strides Required for Reliable Gait Measurements in Older Adult Fallers and Non-Fallers.

Drew Commandeur, Marc Klimstra, Kaya Yoshida, Sandra Hundza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Drew CommandeurMotion and Mobility Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2672-0677
Marc KlimstraMotion and Mobility Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5512-0558
Kaya YoshidaRehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Sandra HundzaMotion and Mobility Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the value of walking gait metrics collected using pressure-sensing walkways has shown promise for fall risk assessment, there is no consensus on the minimum number of strides required to obtain reliable metrics. This study aimed to determine the minimum stride count required for reliable single-task (ST), dual-task (DT), and difference score (DS) measurements of the spatio-temporal parameters of gait in older adult fallers and non-fallers. Forty community-dwelling older adults (74.6 ± 3.5 years) performed 10 ST and 10 DT walking passes (~100 strides total) across a GAITRite™ pressure mat. Nine truncated datasets (1-9 passes) were created from the original for each walking condition to assess agreement using two-way random effects, absolute agreement, and single-rater intraclass correlations (ICCs). ICCs demonstrated that a minimum of one pass (~10 strides) is sufficient for reliable mean gait metrics for ST and DT conditions and 10-30 strides for DS, while 10-80 strides are needed for reliable gait variability measures, depending on the metric. This study provides stride count recommendations to ensure reliable gait measurement in older adult populations, highlighting that as few as 10-30 strides are necessary for mean metrics, while variability metrics may require up to 80 strides to ensure reliability.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsGaitWalkingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGait AnalysisHumansMaledifference scoredual-taskfallersgaitgait reliabilityGAITRiteminimum stridesolder adults

Identifiers

PMID39686203
PMCPMC11645060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.