ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Automatic Detection and Classification of Natural Weld Defects Using Alternating Magneto-Optical Imaging and ResNet50.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is difficult to detect and identify natural defects in welded components. To solve this problem, according to the Faraday magneto-optical (MO) effect, a nondestructive testing system for MO imaging, excited by an alternating magnetic field, is established. For the acquired MO images of crack, pit, lack of penetration, gas pore, and no defect, Gaussian filtering, bilateral filtering, and median filtering are applied for image preprocessing. The effectiveness of these filtering methods is evaluated using metrics such as peak signal-noise ratio (PSNR) and mean squared error. Principal component analysis (PCA) is employed to extract column vector features from the downsampled defect MO images, which then serve as the input layer for the error backpropagation (BP) neural network model and the support vector machine (SVM) model. These two models can be used for the classification of partial defect MO images, but the recognition accuracy for cracks and gas pores is comparatively low. To further enhance the classification accuracy of natural weld defects, a convolutional neural network (CNN) classification model and a ResNet50 classification model for MO images of natural weld defects are established, and the model parameters are evaluated and optimized. The experimental results show that the overall classification accuracy of the ResNet50 model is 99%. Compared with the PCA-SVM model and CNN model, the overall classification accuracy was increased by 7.4% and 1.8%, and the classification accuracy of gas pore increased by 10% and 4%, respectively, indicating that the ResNet50 model can effectively and accurately classify natural weld defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.