ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Investigation of 3D Printed Self-Sensing UHPC Composites Using Graphite and Hybrid Carbon Microfibers.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Piezoresistive Sensing Performance of Smart Layer in Multi-Material 3D-Printed Reinforced Cementitious Beams.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Embedment of 3D Printed Self-Sensing Composites for Smart Cementitious Components.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explores the development of 3D-printed self-sensing Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) by incorporating graphite (G) powder, milled carbon microfiber (MCMF), and chopped carbon microfiber (CCMF) as additives into the UHPC matrix to enhance piezoresistive properties while maintaining workability for 3D printing. Percolation curves were established to identify optimal filler inclusion levels, and a series of compressive tests, including quasi-static cyclic, dynamic cyclic, and monotonic compressive loading, were conducted to evaluate the piezoresistive and mechanical performance of 29 different mix designs. It was found that incorporating G powder improved the conductivity of the UHPC but decreased compressive strength for both mold-cast and 3D-printed specimens. However, incorporating either MCMF or CCMF into the UHPC resulted in the maximum 9.8% and 19.2% increase in compressive strength and Young's modulus, respectively, compared to the plain UHPC. The hybrid combination of MCMF and CCMF showed particularly effective in enhancing sensing performance, achieving strain linearity over 600 με. The best-preforming specimens (3G250M250CCMF) were fabricated using 3 wt% of G, 0.25 wt% of MCMF, and 0.25 wt% of CCMF, yielding a maximum strain gauge factor of 540, a resolution of 68 με, and an accuracy of 4.5 με under axial compression. The 3D-printed version of the best-performing specimens exhibited slightly diminished piezoresistive and mechanical behaviors compared to their mold-cast counterparts, yielding a maximum strain gauge factor of 410, a resolution of 99 με, and an accuracy of 8.6 με.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.