ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Integrating Remote Photoplethysmography and Machine Learning on Multimodal Dataset for Noninvasive Heart Rate Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-Time Current Volume Estimation System from an Azure Kinect Camera in Pediatric Intensive Care: Technical Development.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-contact heart monitoring is crucial in advancing telemedicine, fitness tracking, and mass screening. Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) is a non-contact technique to obtain information about heart pulse by analyzing the changes in the light intensity reflected or absorbed by the skin during the blood circulation cycle. However, this technique is sensitive to environmental lightning and different skin pigmentation, resulting in unreliable results. This research presents a multimodal approach to non-contact heart rate estimation by combining facial video and physical attributes, including age, gender, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI). For this purpose, we collected local datasets from 60 individuals containing a 1 min facial video and physical attributes such as age, gender, weight, and height, and we derived the BMI variable from the weight and height. We compare the performance of two machine learning models, support vector regression (SVR) and random forest regression on the multimodal dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that incorporating a multimodal approach enhances model performance, with the random forest model achieving superior results, yielding a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.057 bpm, a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 10.532 bpm, and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 4.2% that outperforms the state-of-the-art rPPG methods. These findings highlight the potential for interpretable, non-contact, real-time heart rate measurement systems to contribute effectively to applications in telemedicine and mass screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.