Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686071›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Detecting Unusual Repetitive Patterns of Behavior Indicative of a Loop-Based Attack in IoT.

Asmaa Munshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Asmaa MunshiCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9933-0629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the high risk of Internet of Things (IoT) device compromise, it is crucial to discuss the attack detection aspect. However, due to the physical limitations of IoT, such as battery life and sensing and processing power, the widely used detection techniques, such as signature-based or anomaly-based detection, are quite ineffective. This research extracted loop-based cases from the transmission session dataset of "CTU-IoT-Malware-Capture-7-1" ("Linux, Mirai") and implemented a loop-based detection machine learning approach. The research employed nine machine learning models to illustrate how the loop patterns of the datasets can facilitate detection. The results of this study indicate that the XGBoost model achieves the best performance in terms of "Accuracy: 8.85%", "Precision: 96.57% (Class)", "Recall: 96.72% (Class 1)", and "F1-Score: 6.24%". The XGBoost model demonstrated exceptional performance across all metrics, indicating its capability in handling large IoT datasets effectively. It provides not only high accuracy but also strong generalization, which is crucial for detecting intricate and diverse patterns of malicious behavior in IoT networks. Its precision and recall performance further highlight its robustness in identifying both attack and normal activity, reducing the chances of false positives and negatives, making it a superior choice for real-time IoT threat detection.

Indexed as

detection of attacks IoT loop-based attacksmalicious attacks

Identifiers

PMID39686071
PMCPMC11644736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.