ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Movement Sensing Opportunities for Monitoring Dynamic Cognitive States.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing psychological resilience and decision-making in basketball players through emerging technologies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Inferring Mental States via Linear and Non-Linear Body Movement Dynamics: A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In occupational domains such as sports, healthcare, driving, and military, both individuals and small groups are expected to perform challenging tasks under adverse conditions that induce transient cognitive states such as stress, workload, and uncertainty. Wearable and standoff 6DOF sensing technologies are advancing rapidly, including increasingly miniaturized yet robust inertial measurement units (IMUs) and portable marker-less infrared optical motion tracking. These sensing technologies may offer opportunities to track overt physical behavior and classify cognitive states relevant to human performance in diverse human-machine domains. We describe progress in research attempting to distinguish cognitive states by tracking movement behavior in both individuals and small groups, examining potential applications in sports, healthcare, driving, and the military. In the context of military training and operations, there are no generally accepted methods for classifying transient mental states such as uncertainty from movement-related data, despite its importance for shaping decision-making and behavior. To fill this gap, an example data set is presented including optical motion capture of rifle trajectories during a dynamic marksmanship task that elicits variable uncertainty; using machine learning, we demonstrate that features of weapon trajectories capturing the complexity of motion are valuable for classifying low versus high uncertainty states. We argue that leveraging metrics of human movement behavior reveals opportunities to complement relatively costly and less portable neurophysiological sensing technologies and enables domain-specific human-machine interfaces to support a wide range of cognitive functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.